Hello, dear Mr. Guo, I have read this document.
Based on my opinions, the Kleptocrats will
definitely deny the authenticity of the document.
GUO: What do you think about the authenticity? Are you
We can talk about the confidential stuff through the other
channel, and the authenticity here.
(This document) is
Commissioner, should be no problem, I
GUO: Great. Please read and consider the wording in the
document carefully, whether there is any mistake (which
undermines the authenticity), please, please do it.
Ok, Mr. Guo. I will look into it more carefully. Thank you.
Hello, dear Mr. GUO. I have read the document thoroughly
Indeed, there is something misspelt: ZHI(峙) of DUIZHI （对峙）.
As regards the grammar matters, I think it is a little hard
As for forwarding(cc in emails) to Ministry of Foreign Affairs,
Ministry of Commerce, I think it is ok to forward to the General Office of
State Council, who will again forward to respective ministries.
The General Office of State Council should know whom to send
As regarding other information in the document, let me check
with the Commissioner later, since he is
off work right now.
Great, no problem. No matter you check with the Commissioner
or not, I need to make sure that it is authentic, because the information I
will communicate with F department must be authentic.
This is very vital. It is not important what we can get from
it (presenting this document to F department).
They (kleptocrats) may fabricate fake stuff, are we going to
do the same?!
Why are we not doing so? We need to be responsible for
whatever we present, this is a MUST, otherwise our enemy will take advantage of
it (if we make fake info).
That’s all I want to say. Thank you!
Yes, dear Mr. Guo. I got
I believe the Commissioner will help check
with his colleagues who were in charge of (handling) this document to
understand the whole thing, as well as explain the misspelling and mistakes in the
Good. Based on my years of experience with these
kleptocrats, their mistakes do not surprise me. They are not always correct as people
I saw a
mis-distribute of top classified document, which caused the downfall of QIAO Shi and LIU
Huaqing – got their ass kicked by JIANG Zemin and ZENG Qinghong.
Their mistakes are far more than this, mistakes in sending
the documents, some were even sent to USA.
So the suspicious portion in the document may not impact the
authenticity of the whole document.
We need to be objective and trustworthy. We believe in
ourselves, alright? Thank you Mr. Zhou.
Btw, please be cautious and be safe (when you’re working on
getting sensitive docs). Please!
Such as the document about LIU Chengjie and GUAN Jun, you
have to remember, there are records left when anyone looks into their info, so
you cannot leave right after getting the info.
Again, please be aware of your safety! It is the key for us
to reach our goal of Himalaya.
We are not working for them(Kleptocrats). It does not matter
where we are now, our victory is the thing that matters.
You are absolutely right. Thank you so much, dear Mr. Guo.
We all firmly believe that we will defeat this group of
kleptocrats, which may take 1 or 2 years.
This one or two – year effort will definitely pay off, and
lead us to the top of Mt. Everest, our Himalaya. Don’t worry!
Good evening, dear Mr. Guo.
I have contacted with the Commissioner this morning about
The Commissioner said he will not for whatever reasons,
question the the Person (handling the document) about the authenticity of
The reason is simple, in their small business circle, their
relationship with each other is not leading or being led, it is cooperating and
trusting each other.
If we are going to question the authenticity of the document,
Commissioner has a concern that the trust (between him and the
Person) will be weakened, which may hurt future cooperation.
On the other hand, the Person will guarantee the
authenticity of the document if you ask him.
About the mistakes, The Commissioner thinks that this
top classified document is different from other documents (for public
distribution), the checking of the document is focused on the critical wordings
and messages, the proofreaders are not under a lot of pressure, therefore
misspelling sometimes happen.
Another reason is that the dictionary shows that the misspelling
also exists as a synonym – DUIZHI was intended to express long-lasting violent
It is totally understandable and acceptable.
Please do not ask The Commissioner to verify again. It
is no good.
As long as we have an idea, everything is depended on our
Our ultimate goals are these kleptocrats, these documents
reflect their real faces, that we all understand.
Please ask the Commissioner to be safe. Thank
you very much.
For the wording of the document, the Commissioner said the
focus is the clearness and key words, no fancy vocabulary needed.
He also asks you to check the document give to you last time
– the wordings are more beautiful.
That’s right. We don’t need to fake the document, it’s
We have enough real documents to handle, why do we need to
The Commissioner also said that the QR Code is not mandatory,
especially for the top classified document within central government (not for
QR code is not required, except for document from central
government to local (government), and military in the field.
Using QR code for this top classified document has high risk
of information leaking.
The Commissioner also appreciate your (Mr. GUO) understanding
and kind reminding.
We will be taking extra care of our safety.
The Commissioner is trying his best to follow up on the other
files, good news will be coming soon. Thank you!
I understand. Completely understand.
Thank you, Mr. Guo.
Myself and the Commissioner, we all believe
that we will definitely win, if not this year, next year. Thank you.
I would expect that we will take down half of them before
the Chinese New Year, take down half.
Yes. I fully agree and support you. Thank you Mr. Guo.